Swansea Data Recovery: The UK’s No.1 RAID 5, 6 & 10 Recovery Specialists
For 25 years, Swansea Data Recovery has been the UK’s leading specialist in recovering data from complex redundant arrays. RAID 5 (striping with distributed parity), RAID 6 (striping with double distributed parity), and RAID 10 (mirrored stripes) offer robust performance and fault tolerance, but their complexity introduces unique failure modes that can lead to catastrophic data loss. We provide professional recovery services for all types of these arrays, from small 3-disk RAID 5 setups to massive 32-disk enterprise RAID 6 configurations, across all hardware controllers, software implementations, and NAS devices.
Supported Systems & NAS Devices
Top 15 NAS Brands & Popular Models for RAID 5/6/10 in the UK:
Synology: DiskStation DS1621+, DS1821+, DS3622xs+
QNAP: TVS-872X, TS-1635AX, TS-h1290FX
Western Digital (WD): My Cloud Pro Series PR4100, PR2100
Buffalo Technology: TeraStation 5120Rh, 3410DN
Netgear: ReadyNAS RN626X, RN424
Asustor: AS6508T, AS7110T
Thecus: N8850, N12000V
Terramaster: D8-332, F8-422
Dell EMC: PowerVault NX3240
HP: ProLiant Storage Server
Lenovo: ThinkSystem DE Series
Seagate: BlackArmor NAS 440
Infortrend: EonStor DS 1024D
Promise Technology: VTrak E610sD
LaCie: 12big Rack 4U
Top 15 RAID 5/6/10 Server Brands & Models:
Dell EMC: PowerEdge R740xd, R750xa, PowerVault MD3460
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE): ProLiant DL380 Gen10, StoreEver MSL2024
IBM/Lenovo: ThinkSystem SR650, ST250
Supermicro: SuperStorage 6048R-E1CR24N, 2028U-TR4
Cisco: UCS C240 M5 SD
Fujitsu: PRIMERGY RX2530 M5, RX4770 M1
Oracle: Sun Fire X4270 M3, ZFS Storage Appliance
Hitachi Vantara: VSP E Series, HUS VM
NetApp: FAS Series (FAS2600, AFF A250)
Intel: Server System S2600WF
Acer: Altos R380 F2
ASUS: RS720-E9-RS12U
Promise Technology: Vess R3660
Areca: ARC-8050T3
QNAP: TS-EC2480U R2
Top 25 RAID 5, 6 & 10 Errors & Our Technical Recovery Process
1. Multiple Simultaneous Drive Failures in RAID 5
Summary: Two or more drives fail in a RAID 5 array, exceeding its single-drive fault tolerance and causing array failure.
Technical Recovery: We create physical images of all drives, including failed ones (via cleanroom recovery if needed). Using virtual RAID reconstruction software, we perform parity inversion calculations. For each unrecoverable sector from the second failed drive, we use the formula: Failed_Drive_Data = Surviving_Drive1_Data XOR Surviving_Drive2_Data XOR Parity_Data. This allows mathematical reconstruction of missing data by solving the XOR equation across the stripe set.
2. Triple Drive Failure in RAID 6
Summary: Three drives fail in a RAID 6 array, exceeding its two-drive fault tolerance through Reed-Solomon codes or dual parity.
Technical Recovery: After imaging all drives, we employ Galois field algebra to reconstruct data. Unlike RAID 5’s simple XOR, RAID 6 uses polynomial equations: P = D₁ + D₂ + D₃ + ... + Dₙ and Q = a¹D₁ + a²D₂ + a³D₃ + ... + aⁿDₙ. By solving these simultaneous equations using the surviving drives’ data, we can recover from two complete drive failures, and partially recover data where the third failure overlaps.
3. Failed Rebuild Process on Degraded Array
Summary: A rebuild process initiated after a single drive failure fails due to encountering bad sectors on surviving drives or a second drive failure during rebuild.
Technical Recovery: We create pre-rebuild images of all drives. Using staleness analysis, we identify which sectors were being written during the failed rebuild. We then perform a virtual rollback by reconstructing the array state before rebuild initiation, using the original failed drive’s data (recovered via physical means) combined with the pre-rebuild state of surviving drives.
4. RAID Controller Metadata Corruption
Summary: The controller’s configuration metadata (stored in NVRAM or on disk) becomes corrupted, losing critical parameters like stripe size, disk order, and parity rotation.
Technical Recovery: We image all drives and perform combinatorial parameter analysis. Our software tests thousands of combinations of stripe sizes (4KB-1MB+), disk orders, and parity directions (left/right symmetric/asymmetric, forward/backward dynamic). The correct configuration is identified when file system structures (NTFS $MFT, EXT superblocks) align perfectly across calculated stripe boundaries.
5. URE (Unrecoverable Read Error) During Rebuild
Summary: A single uncorrectable read error on a surviving drive during RAID 5 rebuild causes the entire rebuild process to abort.
Technical Recovery: We use hardware imagers with adaptive read techniques – multiple read attempts with progressively slower timing and reduced retry thresholds. For the specific sector causing the URE, we attempt reconstruction using XOR parity from the corresponding stripe: Bad_Sector = (All_Other_Data_Sectors_In_Stripe) XOR Parity_Sector.
6. RAID 10 Mirror-Set Failure
Summary: Multiple drive failures occur within the same mirror set of a RAID 10 array, breaking the stripe and causing data loss.
Technical Recovery: We treat this as multiple independent RAID 1 recoveries. Each mirror set is analysed separately. For broken mirror sets, we perform physical recovery on failed drives. The surviving mirror sets provide complete data for their stripes, while recovered mirror sets are reassembled using standard RAID 1 techniques before the overall stripe set is reconstructed.
7. Partial Write/Write Hole Corruption
Summary: Power loss during write operations leaves some drives updated while others contain old data, creating parity inconsistencies.
Technical Recovery: We analyse parity blocks versus data blocks across all drives. Inconsistent stripes are identified where Parity != D₁ XOR D₂ XOR ... XOR Dₙ. We then use file system journal replay (NTFS $LogFile, EXT journal) to roll back incomplete transactions to the last consistent state before the power loss event.
8. Accidental Array Reinitialization
Summary: The entire array is mistakenly reinitialized, overwriting RAID metadata and potentially partition tables.
Technical Recovery: We search each drive for backup RAID metadata typically stored at sector 0 or the end of the drive. For manufacturers like Adaptec and LSI, we parse their specific metadata structures (superblocks) to recover original parameters. If metadata is destroyed, we perform raw carving across all drives, using known file signatures to reconstruct data.
9. Drive Removal and Incorrect Reordering
Summary: Drives are physically removed and reinserted in incorrect order, scrambling the array sequence.
Technical Recovery: We test all possible drive order permutations (n! possibilities). The software identifies the correct order by verifying data continuity across stripe boundaries and validating checksums of known file system structures at calculated intervals.
10. Bad Sectors Distributed Across Multiple Drives
Summary: Multiple drives develop bad sectors in different locations, creating a distributed pattern of data loss.
Technical Recovery: We create consolidated bad sector maps for all drives. Our virtual RAID reconstruction uses a priority system: first attempting reads from primary drives, then using parity reconstruction for affected stripes, and finally employing advanced error correction where multiple drives have errors in the same stripe.
11. Firmware Corruption on Multiple Drives
Summary: Firmware issues affect multiple drives simultaneously, often due to bugs or incompatible updates.
Technical Recovery: We use technological modes (PC-3000) to bypass corrupted firmware on affected drives. For each drive, we access the service area to repair modules or read user data directly. The recovery process accounts for the temporal nature of the corruption, prioritizing drives based on their last known good state.
12. RAID 5/6 Expansion Failure
Summary: The process of expanding array capacity fails or is interrupted, leaving the array in an inconsistent state.
Technical Recovery: We recover the pre-expansion RAID metadata and reconstruct the array using original parameters. We then manually complete the expansion process logically in our virtual environment, carefully migrating data to the new layout without risking the original drives.
13. Controller Cache Corruption with BBU Failure
Summary: The controller’s battery backup unit fails, leading to loss of cached writes and potential data corruption.
Technical Recovery: We analyse write patterns across all drives to identify incomplete write sequences. Using file system journal analysis, we identify and roll back transactions that weren’t fully committed, restoring consistency to the last stable checkpoint.
14. Synchronization Loss in Complex Arrays
Summary: The array loses synchronization between components, particularly in nested or complex RAID configurations.
Technical Recovery: We deconstruct the array into its fundamental components (RAID 1 sets within RAID 10, or individual RAID 5/6 sets within nested configurations). Each component is recovered independently before being reassembled into the complete logical volume.
15. File System Corruption on RAID Volume
Summary: The file system on the logical volume becomes corrupted while the underlying RAID structure remains intact.
Technical Recovery: After ensuring proper RAID reconstruction, we perform advanced file system repair. For ZFS, we work with Uberblocks and the ZAP. For NTFS, we repair the $MFT using its mirror. For EXT4, we use journal replay and superblock backups.
16. Viral Encryption on RAID Volume
Summary: Ransomware encrypts files on the active RAID volume.
Technical Recovery: After RAID reconstruction, we employ ransomware-specific recovery techniques including shadow copy analysis, temporary file recovery, and in some cases, cryptographic analysis of the encryption implementation.
17. Backplane or Enclosure Failure
Summary: Physical connectivity issues in the storage enclosure cause multiple drives to appear failed.
Technical Recovery: We remove all drives and connect them directly to controlled ports on our forensic workstations. This eliminates backplane issues and allows accurate assessment of each drive’s true health status.
18. Power Surge Damaging Multiple Components
Summary: Electrical surge damages multiple drive PCBs and potentially the RAID controller.
Technical Recovery: Each damaged PCB undergoes component-level repair with ROM transfer. We systematically replace TVS diodes, fuses, and motor controllers while preserving unique adaptive data from each drive.
19. S.M.A.R.T. Error Cascades
Summary: Predictive S.M.A.R.T. errors cause the controller to preemptively drop multiple drives from the array.
Technical Recovery: We assess the actual severity of S.M.A.R.T. errors through direct media access. Many predictive errors don’t immediately affect data readability. We create stable images by temporarily disabling certain S.M.A.R.T. features in the drive firmware.
20. Manufacturer-Specific RAID Implementations
Summary: Proprietary RAID implementations (Drobo BeyondRAID, Synology SHR) experience unique failure modes.
Technical Recovery: We reverse-engineer the proprietary data structures. For Drobo, we parse packet allocation tables. For Synology SHR, we analyse the Linux mdadm and LVM layers to reconstruct the logical volume.
21. Thermal Damage in High-Density Arrays
Summary: Overheating in densely packed arrays causes premature media degradation and electronic failures.
Technical Recovery: Each affected drive requires individual thermal assessment and stabilization. We use specialized imaging techniques with temperature monitoring and adjusted read strategies for heat-affected media.
22. Rebuild on Wrong Drive
Summary: The controller incorrectly identifies a healthy drive as failed and begins rebuilding onto it.
Technical Recovery: We immediately image all drives to preserve pre-rebuild state. We then perform binary analysis to identify overwritten sectors and reconstruct original data from parity calculations and surviving drive data.
23. Complex RAID Migration Failure
Summary: Migration between RAID levels (e.g., RAID 5 to RAID 6) fails mid-process.
Technical Recovery: We recover the original RAID configuration metadata and reconstruct the array in its pre-migration state. We then carefully complete the migration process logically in our virtual environment.
24. ZFS RAID-Z Pool Corruption
Summary: ZFS-based RAID (RAID-Z, RAID-Z2) experiences pool corruption due to failed resilvering or memory errors.
Technical Recovery: We use ZFS debugging tools (zdb) to analyse Uberblocks and identify the most recent valid transaction group. We then attempt pool import with rollback options to bypass corrupted metadata.
25. Database Corruption on RAID Arrays
Summary: Critical database files on the RAID volume become corrupted.
Technical Recovery: After RAID reconstruction, we employ database-specific recovery techniques including transaction log analysis, page-level repair, and use of native database utilities to bring the database to a consistent state.
Advanced Technical Capabilities
Parity Mathematics:
RAID 5: XOR-based parity P = D₁ ⊕ D₂ ⊕ ... ⊕ Dₙ
RAID 6: Reed-Solomon codes with Galois field arithmetic
Custom algorithms for recovering from beyond-rated failures
Virtual Reconstruction:
Hardware-independent array assembly
Real-time parameter testing and validation
Cross-platform file system support
Physical Recovery Integration:
Simultaneous multi-drive cleanroom operations
Component-level PCB repair with ROM preservation
Firmware-level access and modification
Why Choose Swansea Data Recovery?
25 Years of Complex RAID Expertise: Specialized knowledge in parity-based array recovery
Mathematical Recovery Methods: Advanced algorithms for beyond-rated failures
Multi-Drive Cleanroom Capabilities: Simultaneous physical recovery of multiple failed drives
Proprietary System Knowledge: Expertise in vendor-specific implementations
Free Comprehensive Diagnostics: Detailed assessment and fixed-price quotation
Contact Swansea Data Recovery today for a free, confidential evaluation of your failed RAID 5, 6, or 10 array. Trust the UK’s leading complex storage recovery specialists for mission-critical data recovery.